Box 5
Contains 18 Results:
A Legal Response to Legislative Failure: ARC v North Dakota , UND Honor's Thesis by Karissa Haugeberg: May 2000
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Synopsis: Association for Retarded Citizens v. Olson, by John Kapsner and Lynn Boughey: undated
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence: 1981-1995
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1982
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1983
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1984
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1985
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1986
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Bench Book XXIX: November 1988-December 1989
Judge Van Sickle recorded his hand-written notes regarding cases tried in his court in thirty six ledger books. The ledgers date from January 1972 to January 2000, and encompass Van Sickle's tenure on the North Dakota bench, as well as the cases he heard in numerous other districts and circuits. The ledgers were kept in their original chronological order.
Bench Book XXX: December 1989-October 1991
Judge Van Sickle recorded his hand-written notes regarding cases tried in his court in thirty six ledger books. The ledgers date from January 1972 to January 2000, and encompass Van Sickle's tenure on the North Dakota bench, as well as the cases he heard in numerous other districts and circuits. The ledgers were kept in their original chronological order.