Box 6
Contains 34 Results:
Special Master's Panel, Report of the Panel of Special Masters: November 1994
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Special Master's Panel, Rulings: 1992-1995
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Special Master's Panel, Testimony Notes Taken by Van Sickle: 1992-1993
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Newspaper Clippings: 1982-2000
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.