Box 6
Contains 34 Results:
Transcript of Press Report Read by Van Sickle to KXJB TV: August 2, 1988
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Transcripts of Proceedings and Conferences: 1985-1990
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Miscellaneous
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Synopsis: Coleman v. Block, by Lynn Boughey and Sarah Vogel: undated
In Coleman v. Block, Van Sickle ordered the Farmers Home Administration to change its loan-repayment and foreclosure policies.
Correspondence: 1983-1986
In Coleman v. Block, Van Sickle ordered the Farmers Home Administration to change its loan-repayment and foreclosure policies.
Correspondence: 1987-1990
In Coleman v. Block, Van Sickle ordered the Farmers Home Administration to change its loan-repayment and foreclosure policies.
Orders by Van Sickle: 1983-1992
In Coleman v. Block, Van Sickle ordered the Farmers Home Administration to change its loan-repayment and foreclosure policies.
Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1987-1990
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Orders by Van Sickle:41-50
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Index for Orders 1-50
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.