Box 6
Contains 34 Results:
Legal Reference Materials
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Memorandum Agreement: 1985-1986
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Notes by Van Sickle: undated
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Orders (not with those numbered 1-50), U.S. Court of Appeals: 1994-1996
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Special Master's Panel, Correspondence: 1992-1995
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Special Master's Panel, Membership
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Special Master's Panel, Report of the Panel of Special Masters: November 1994
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Final Order and Judgment: February 1995
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Orders (not with those numbered 1-50) by Van Sickle: 1982-1994
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.
Nursing Home Ad Hoc Committee: 1988
In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.