Skip to main content

Box 5

 Container

Contains 18 Results:

A Legal Response to Legislative Failure: ARC v North Dakota , UND Honor's Thesis by Karissa Haugeberg: May 2000

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 11
Identifier: Folder 11
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Synopsis: Association for Retarded Citizens v. Olson, by John Kapsner and Lynn Boughey: undated

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 12
Identifier: Folder 12
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence: 1981-1995

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 13
Identifier: Folder 13
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1982

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 14
Identifier: Folder 14
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1983

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 15
Identifier: Folder 15
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1984

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 16
Identifier: Folder 16
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1985

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 17
Identifier: Folder 17
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001

Correspondence with Dr. Robert Eelkema, Court Monitor: 1986

 File — Box: 5, Folder: 18
Identifier: Folder 18
Scope and Contents From the Sub-Series:

In the ARC Case, Van Sickle found that North Dakota 's system for the care of the developmentally disabled violated the constitutional rights of its residents by being overcrowded, underfunded and understaffed.

Dates: created: 1956-2007; Other: Majority of material found in 1971-2000; Other: Date acquired: 09/27/2001